Price v. Cannon
Supreme Court of Missouri
ON ERROR from the Howard Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtWash, J.
Cannon, the defendant in error, sued Price, the plaintiff in error, in the Howard Circuit Court, by petition and summons, on a promisrory note. Price pleaded,
First. Nil debet.
Second. Payment on the day.
Third. Payment before the day.
Fourth. Payment of ten dollars to Cannon on the 1st day of Oct., 1833, and after the note became due upon the promise of Cannon, that in consideration thereof he *319would wait with the defendant for the remaining part of said sum in the petition mentioned, until the 1st of March, 1834, &c.
Fifth. Payment of ten dollars on the 1st October, 1833, in consideration of…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Young v. SchofieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
- Swaggard v. HancockMissouri Court of Appeals · 1887
- Henson v. SteverMissouri Court of Appeals · 1897
- Occidental Life Ins. v. EilerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
- Stephens v. CurtnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.