Southwestern States General Corp. v. McKenzie
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
1Opinion of the Court
ROWE, Justice.
By original motion filed in this court, appellee seeks to review the sufficiency of certain arrangements authorized by the trial judge in lieu of a supersedeas bond. These arrangements were designed to permit appellants to supersede under Tex.R. Civ.P. 364(a), a money judgment against them by an alternate method specified in Tex.R.Civ.P. 14c, that is, by deposit of a negotiable obligation of a bank. With the exception of one independent feature, likely correctable, we hold these arrangements to be sufficient. We, therefore, allow appellants twenty days to correct the deficiency…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Fortune v. McElhenneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Kennesaw Life & Accident Insurance Co. v. StreetmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Cashion v. CashionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
- Sams v. CokerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Heritage Housing Corp. v. Ferguson, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.