Legal Opinion

People v. Stevens

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 17, 1939No. Crim. 3179PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

In an amended information filed by the district attorney, appellant, William Schuffert, and defendant George M. Stevens were jointly charged with two counts of robbery. Pursuant to the provisions of section 969c of the Penal Code, it was further alleged in the amended information that at the time of the commission of the respective offenses “said defendants were armed with a deadly weapon, to-wit, a pistol”.

Defendant Stevens pleaded guilty to the charge of robbery as contained in count I and admitted that at the time of the commission of said offense he was armed with a deadly weapon. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. KizerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  2. People v. ParadisoNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. People v. KevlonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  4. People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  5. People v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Gammel v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  3. People v. WadeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  4. People v. WallaceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. People v. PerrymanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API