Legal Opinion

District 50 Metropolitan Recreation District v. Burnside

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 10, 1965No. 21645PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McWilliams

District 50 Metropolitan Recreation District, a quasi-municipal corporation, and certain named individuals by amended complaint brought a declaratory judgment action wherein they sought a declaration and order of court that 1960 Perm. Supp., C.R.S., Section 89-12-8 is unconstitutional for the reason that the statute purports to exempt certain property lying within the recreation district from taxation for the support of the district without the written consent of the owners thereof, and that such purported exemption is in direct conflict with Article X, Section 3 of the Colorado Constitution…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. J. & R. A. Savageau, Inc. v. LarsenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1947
  2. Marzec v. FREMONT COUNTY, COLORADO SCHOOL DIST. NO. 2Supreme Court of Colorado · 1957
  3. Cable v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
  4. Nutter v. WrightSupreme Court of Colorado · 1955
  5. Abbott v. PoynterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brody v. BockSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  2. Gates Rubber Co. v. South Suburban Metropolitan Recreation & Park DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  3. FSDW, LLC v. First Nat. BankColorado Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. People v. ProffittColorado Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. FSDW, LLC v. First National BankColorado Court of Appeals · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API