Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Rooks v. Rooks

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 18, 1984No. 40304Published

1ConcurrenceWeltner, Justice

The thesis set forth in Stokes appears to be a simple, straightforward rule, which even the casual reader will comprehend. The problem — as evidenced by this case — is not in the formulation of the rule, but in a correct discernment of those transactions which fall within it. Was the transfer of the house to the husband a gift? If so, what, then, was the $4,000 payment by the husband to the mother? Was the transfer part gift and part sale? Or, was it but a sale at a below-market value?

Spouses frequently receive properties from one another and from others, and accomplish transfers back and…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Stokes v. StokesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  2. Ramsay v. SimsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  3. Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  4. Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  5. Harrell v. HarrellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API