Carolina Business Brokers v. Strickland
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Shaw, Judge:
Respondent, Carolina Business Brokers, d/b/a Sunbelt Business Brokers (hereinafter Sunbelt), sued appellant, George C. Strickland, for payment of a broker’s commission under the terms of a listing agreement entered into between the parties. The master found for Sunbelt awarding a $40,000 commission and attorney’s fees. Strickland appeals. We reverse.
This being a case at law, the facts must be viewed in the light most favorable to Sunbelt. The findings of fact of the master will not be disturbed upon appeal unless found to be without evidence which reasonably supports the judge’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- May v. HopkinsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
- Thomas-McCain, Inc. v. SiterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
- Hamrick v. Cooper River Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1953
- Bishop Realty & Rentals, Inc. v. Perk, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
3Cited by3 opinions
- MARO v. LewisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
- Carolina Business Brokers v. StricklandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
- Carolina Business Brokers v. StricklandCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990