Legal Opinion

Carolina Business Brokers v. Strickland

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided June 5, 1989No. 1348PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Shaw, Judge:

Respondent, Carolina Business Brokers, d/b/a Sunbelt Business Brokers (hereinafter Sunbelt), sued appellant, George C. Strickland, for payment of a broker’s commission under the terms of a listing agreement entered into between the parties. The master found for Sunbelt awarding a $40,000 commission and attorney’s fees. Strickland appeals. We reverse.

This being a case at law, the facts must be viewed in the light most favorable to Sunbelt. The findings of fact of the master will not be disturbed upon appeal unless found to be without evidence which reasonably supports the judge’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. May v. HopkinsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  2. Thomas-McCain, Inc. v. SiterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  3. Hamrick v. Cooper River Lumber Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1953
  4. Bishop Realty & Rentals, Inc. v. Perk, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. MARO v. LewisCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2010
  2. Carolina Business Brokers v. StricklandSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1990
  3. Carolina Business Brokers v. StricklandCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API