Legal Opinion
Hoerner v. ANCO Insulations, Inc.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided February 3, 1999No. Nos. 98-C-1398, 98-C-1598PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
| iKLEES, Chief Judge.
In these two consolidated writs, we consider whether medical reports prepared by a plaintiffs physician and directed to plaintiffs counsel are discoverable under La. C.C.P. art. 1424.1
The defendant in both cases, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company (3M), issued to medical doctors subpoenas seeking, inter alia, “any and all medical reports” regarding treatment administered to the plaintiffs. Counsel for the plaintiffs filed a motion to quash in each case.2
In Hoerner v. ANCO Insulations, Inc., 98-1398 (La.App. 4 Cir. 7/21/98), plaintiffs moved to quash the Subpoena…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hodges v. Southern Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
- Moak v. Illinois Cent. R. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Wolford v. JoEllen Smith Psych. Hosp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
- Young v. LogueLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1995
- State, Dept. of Transp. & Develop. v. StumpfSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ramos v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2025