Gamage v. Bushell
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. cited: Stephen’s N. P.. Assump. 332-343; O’Fallon v. Boismenu, 3 Mo. -286;; Clarences. Marshall, 2 C. & M. 502 ; Wag. Stat. 89, sec. 48.. cited: Aubuchon v. Levy, 23 Mo. 99 ; 71 111. 487 ; 38 Me. 593 ; Gibson v. Taylor, 16-' Mass. 280; 3 Kent’s Com. 625 ; Chambers v. Wright, 40-Mo. 482; Kohler v. Knapp, 1 Bradf.
Read the full summary
Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. cited: Stephen’s N. P.. Assump. 332-343; O’Fallon v. Boismenu, 3 Mo. -286;; Clarences. Marshall, 2 C. & M. 502 ; Wag. Stat. 89, sec. 48.. cited: Aubuchon v. Levy, 23 Mo. 99 ; 71 111. 487 ; 38 Me. 593 ; Gibson v. Taylor, 16-' Mass. 280; 3 Kent’s Com. 625 ; Chambers v. Wright, 40-Mo. 482; Kohler v. Knapp, 1 Bradf. (N. Y.) 241; Taylor’s L. & T. 283, sec. 390; Redf. on Wills, 170, sec. 7, p. 120, sec. 17 ; Drinkwater v. Drinkwater, 4 Mass. 358 ;. Wag. Stat. 89, sec. 50 ; Papin v. Allen, 33 Mo. 260 ; Jones v. Putnam, 29 Mo. 456 ; 28 Mo. 248 ; 43 Mo. 350 ;…
1Opinion of the CourtGantt, P. J.
Mary C. Gamage and Walter, her husband, sued Bushell .to the April term, 1873,.of the St. Louis Circuit Court, for $730, which they alleged that he had received to their use. The answer of defendant denied that plaintiffs were married, and denied that he was indebted to plaintiffs in the sum of $730, or any other sum, for money had and received to the use of plaintiffs. The case was tried in June, 1873, by the court without a jury, and there was a judgment for plaintiffs in the sum of $630.
By the bill of exceptions it appears that Bennett, a witness for plaintiffs, testified that he rented…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Biddle v. BoyceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1850
- Bury v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1848
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sidway v. Missouri Land & Live Stock Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1901
- Kerr v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
- Hartnett v. FeganMissouri Court of Appeals · 1876
- Lewis v. CarsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1884