Legal Opinion · Dissent

Moyle v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of N.Y.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 11, 1942No. 15450Published

1Dissent

Mr. Associate Justice Stukes

(dissenting) :

I regret that I do not agree that the issue presented by this appeal is properly determinable by the Court upon the evidence of the earnings of the insured; if it were, it would be a difficult case and I am not prepared to say that I would dissent from Mr. Justice Baker’s decision.

But in my view the appeal presents no such problem; it is only one of law, not of fact; was there evidence from which the jury could reasonably infer, as by their verdict they did, that plaintiff was disabled within the terms of the policies, in the light of the decisions of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Davis v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  2. Haynes v. Ware Shoals Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  3. Long v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of N.Y.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API