Legal Opinion

President of Hallowell & Augusta Bank v. Howard

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 15, 1816PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Assumpsit upon a promissory note made payable by the defend ants to the plaintiffs.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

Nothing is a lawful tender but gold and silver. To permit the defendants thus to set off these promissory notes would be allowing cross demands to be set off in like manner in every case. These notes are nothing more than evidence of a right of action ; so that, if the assignment were out of the question, the motion could not obtain. The only course in such case would be, for the present defendants to obtain a judgment upon the notes and set off such judgment against the plaintiffs’ judgment.

The defendants were afterwards defaulted.

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Farmer's Bank of Virginia v. GettingerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1870
  2. West, Oliver & Co. v. BallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1847
  3. Northampton Bank v. BallietSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1844
  4. Clark v. LeachMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
  5. Ellis v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1868

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API