Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Ebbets

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided May 15, 1904PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Motion by two grandnephews for a payment on account of their distributive share in decedent’s estate.

1Opinion of the Court

Church, S.

This is a motion by two grandnephews for a payment on account of their distributive share in decedent’s estate. It is opposed on the ground that they are not next of kin under the statute.

Although the deceased left a will, as the legacy had lapsed, the parties take as if he had died intestate. His only relatives were as follows: Three nephews and a niece, the children of a deceased brother, James Ebbets; a grandnephew, the son of a deceased niece, who was the daughter of the said James Ebbsts, deceased; two grandnephews (the petitioners herein), sons of a deceased nephew, Harry V.…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Account of Proceedings of YoungsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1911
  2. In re the Transfer Tax upon the Estate of RoweNew York Surrogate's Court · 1918
  3. In re the Estate of McKeonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1960
  4. In re Van GordenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  5. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of PeckNew York Surrogate's Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API