Legal Opinion

United States v. One 1957 Plymouth 4-Door Sedan

District Court, D. Utah

Decided May 6, 1959No. C-117-58Published

1Opinion of the Court

CHRISTENSON, District Judge.

Claimant’s motion for a new trial on the ground that the Court erroneously instructed the jury that transportation of untaxpaid liquor with intent to avoid payment of tax would subject the automobile to forfeiture under Title 26 U.S.C. § 7301, was taken under advisement by the Court and is hereby denied.

There have been various views expressed concerning the meaning of the word “removal” used in the forfeiture provisions of former revenue statutes. Substantial authority supports claimant’s contention that the word “removal” did not cover mere unlawful transportation…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. One Ford Coupe AutomobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. United States v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  3. Price v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1945
  4. United States v. One Cadillac Automobile Bearing Motor No. 61-v-238District Court, E.D. Illinois · 1923
  5. United States v. One Ford Automobile TruckDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API