Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 15, 1900PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion for reargument granted.—Motion for reargument.

1Opinion of the Court

Goodrich, P. J.:

The expression in the opinion in this case that we must apply here the same rule that we have heretofore applied in cases of this character,” citing Rippe v. Metropolitan Street R. Co. (35 App. Div. 321) and Edgerley v. Long Island R.R. Co. (44 id. 476), was not intended by the court as an adoption of a fixed rule to the effect that a judgment will not be reversed as against the weight of evidence unless so contrary to the preponderant proof as to startle by its absurdity,"or to suggest suspicion of evil infiuence. The general rule is recognized that such reversal will be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rippe v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kelly v. Brooklyn Heights RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API