HMO-W INC. v. SSM Health Care System

¶ 46. (dissenting in part). Because I conclude that the majority opinion erroneously interprets the dissenters' rights subchapter of Wis. Stat. ch. 180 (2001-02)1 in regard to postjudgment interest, I respectfully dissent from that part of the decision. However, I do agree with the majority opinion in regard to the cross-appeal.

Standard of Review.

¶ 47. The resolution of the appeal turns on questions of statutory interpretation that we resolve de novo. Thielman v. Leean, 2003 WI App 33, ¶ 6, 260 Wis. 2d 253, 659 N.W2d 73. Additionally, whether a statute is ambiguous is a question of law that…