Andretto Bank A. G. v. Goodbody & Co.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSaul S. Streit, J.
Defendant, Goodbody & Co., moves for dismissal of the complaint pursuant to subdivision 4 of rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice. The first two causes are in libel. By the third cause, plaintiff seems to assert a claim of intentional infliction of injury. As to each cause, plaintiff alleges that the acts and conduct therein set forth constitute an actionable wrong under the law of Switzerland. The allegation is the pleader’s conclusion of the effect of the law of Switzerland and whether it is statutory or decisional is not stated. Unless judicial notice of that law is taken in the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pfleuger v. PfleugerNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Arams v. AramsNew York Supreme Court · 1943
- Silberfeld v. Swiss Bank Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1944
- Silberfeld v. Swiss Bank Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
3Cited by1 opinion
- Woolf v. ReedNew York Supreme Court · 1962