Legal Opinion

State v. Dowdell

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 1, 1987No. 1604, September Term, 1986PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOYLAN, Judge.

Although the imprecision makes no difference in this particular case, this appeal illustrates, seemingly for the thousandth time, the epidemic tendency to wander back and forth across the federal-state boundary with little thought as to which sovereign law is being invoked. The Sixth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States provides, in pertinent part, “in all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right ... to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.” That federal provision was made applicable to the states by being deemed incorporated in the due…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carter v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  2. Evans v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  3. Williams v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  4. Brown v. MooreCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API