Legal Opinion

Mayor v. Curran

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided January 24, 1889PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Action in the nature of interpleader, brought by the mayor, aldermen, and commonalty of the city of Yew York against Thomas Curran, Edward Jacobs, and John W. Murray, and others, executors of Andrew J. Dam.

1Opinion of the CourtBookstaver, J.

This is an action in the nature of an interpleader, brought by the mayor, etc., to determine the rights of three separate claimants to a. fund of $2,188.88 on deposit with the comptroller, awarded as damages for the taking of certain lands in the Twenty-Third ward, designated on the damage map of the commissioners of estimate and assessment in the matter of opening and widening Gerard avenue by the number “25;” and also to determine who shall pay the assessment for benefit on the same property, amounting to $646.78. The defendants Curran, Jacobs, and the executors of Dam,, each claim the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. King v. . Mayor, Etc., of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Fisher v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. Peters v. CarletonNew York Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Grade Crossing CommissionersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
  2. In re PierceNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Kinsella v. City of AuburnNew York Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Lawrence v. London & Northwest American Mortgage Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API