Meyer v. W. R. Grace & Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BECHTLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff commenced this diversity action against W. R. Grace & Company (“Grace”) to recover damages resulting from an alleged breach of an employment contract. Specifically, plaintiff asserted that Grace failed to pay him an incentive bonus, as well as certain raises, educational benefits, severance benefits and equipment commissions, in accordance with his employment contract. The case proceeded to trial and, at the close of the plaintiff’s case, the parties settled the claim for equipment commissions and the Court directed a verdict for Grace on the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Dimick v. SchiedtSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Gianni v. Russell Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Lawrence B. Thomas, and Cross-Appellant v. E. J. Korvette, Inc., and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Keystone Aeronautics Corporation, a Corporation v. R. J. Enstrom Corporation, a Corporation v. Foundry Allied Industries, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Martin & Monroe v. BerensSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- The Neiman-Marcus Group, Inc. v. David Dworkin, David Dworkin v. Carter Hawley Hale Stores, Inc., Neiman-Marcus Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Marks v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
- EC Ernst, Inc. v. Koppers Co., Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Continental Casualty Co. v. National Steel Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1982