Legal Opinion

People v. Hood

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 6, 1992No. 1-89-1265PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cerda

Codefendants Angel Hood and Anthony Ortiz were tried simultaneously in severed jury trials by separate juries that were unable to reach a verdict in either case. Defendant Angel Hood was then tried separately in a jury trial that ended in a mistrial because a police officer stated that defendant had taken a polygraph examination. In a third trial, defendant was again tried separately by a jury and was found guilty of first degree murder (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 38, par. 9 — 1). He was sentenced to 62V2 years’ imprisonment. On appeal, defendant asserts that (1) he was not found guilty beyond…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. People v. CollinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  2. People v. YoungIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  3. People v. SmithIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  4. People v. HarrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  5. People v. WeaverIllinois Supreme Court · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  2. People v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  3. People v. CoxAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  4. People v. RiveraAppellate Court of Illinois · 1996
  5. People v. ArmsteadAppellate Court of Illinois · 2001

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API