Legal Opinion

RFD-TV v. WildOpenFence Finance

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 2014No. S-13-581Published

1Opinion of the Court

Nebraska Advance Sheets 318 288 NEBRASKA REPORTS which may have prevented this accident. But because it retains sovereign immunity with respect to such discretionary func- tions, it cannot be held legally liable for its inaction. For these reasons, we affirm the judgment of the district court. Affirmed. Heavican, C.J., not participating. RFD-TV, LLC, appellant, v. WildOpenWest Finance, LLC, doing business as Wow! Cable, and K nology, I nc., appellees. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed June 13, 2014. No. S-13-581. 1. Motions to Dismiss: Jurisdiction: Pleadings: Evidence. When a trial court relies solely on…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Cutco Industries, Inc. v. Dennis E. NaughtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
  2. United States v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Baker v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Dairy Farmers of America, Inc. v. Bassett & Walker International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  5. SK Finance SA v. La Plata County, Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API