RFD-TV v. WildOpenFence Finance
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Nebraska Advance Sheets 318 288 NEBRASKA REPORTS which may have prevented this accident. But because it retains sovereign immunity with respect to such discretionary func- tions, it cannot be held legally liable for its inaction. For these reasons, we affirm the judgment of the district court. Affirmed. Heavican, C.J., not participating. RFD-TV, LLC, appellant, v. WildOpenWest Finance, LLC, doing business as Wow! Cable, and K nology, I nc., appellees. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed June 13, 2014. No. S-13-581. 1. Motions to Dismiss: Jurisdiction: Pleadings: Evidence. When a trial court relies solely on…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Cutco Industries, Inc. v. Dennis E. NaughtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- United States v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Baker v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Dairy Farmers of America, Inc. v. Bassett & Walker International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- SK Finance SA v. La Plata County, Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.