Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Neuger

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided February 14, 1992No. Civ. A. No. 92-B-47PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

BABCOCK, District Judge.

Defendant moves to substitute the United States as defendant pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2679(d)(1). Plaintiff moves to remand this action to state court. The issues are adequately briefed and oral argument will not materially assist their resolution. The attorney general’s designee certified here that Neuger was acting within the scope of his employment at the time of plaintiff's allegations. Because this certification is conclusive for purposes of substitution and removal, defendant’s motion is granted and plaintiff’s motion is denied.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hafer v. MeloSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Melo v. HaferCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  3. Sheila Arbour, Personal Representative of the Estate of Victor Arbour v. Eugene JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  4. Nicholas Nasuti v. James Scannell, Nicholas Nasuti v. James Scannell, United States of America, in Re United States of America and James ScannellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  5. Meridian International Logistics, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jackson v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API