Legal Opinion
Pamela Banse v. Statebridge Company, LLC, et al.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided December 30, 2025No. 2:25-cv-00952Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PAMELA BANSE, Case No. 2:25-cv-00952-CSK 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ 14 STATEBRIDGE COMPANY, LLC, et MOTION TO DISMISS al., 15 (ECF No. 30) Defendants. 16 17 18 Pending before the Court is Defendants Statebridge Company, LLC 19 (“Statebridge”) and Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSP’s (“Wilmington”) motion to 20 dismiss Plaintiff Pamela Banse’s First Amended Complaint (“FAC”).1 A hearing was held 21 over Zoom on August 20, 2025. Jessica Galetta appeared…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Cato v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Karim Khoja v. Orexigen Therapeutics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Richard E. Loux v. B. J. Rhay, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- Evel Knievel Krystal Knievel v. Espn, a Subsidiary of Walt Disney, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.