Legal Opinion

Diamond v. Tau Holding Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 21, 1927PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

This is an action to foreclose a mortgage in the sum of $102,479, covering the premises formerly occupied by the Ringler Brewery on East Ninety-first and East Ninety-second streets, borough of Manhattan. The hen of the mortgage embraces three contiguous parcels, referred to as A, B and C. In so far as parcels A and B are concerned, there is no defense; but as regards parcel C, one of the defendants, Robert, a subsequent lienor, has interposed a plea of priority. He is a holder of two mortgages consolidated into one, in the sum of $11,000, of later date than plaintiff’s, and his claim of prior…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Ingalls and Stockman v. . MorganNew York Court of Appeals · 1854
  2. Twombly v. . CassidyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. Commonwealth Mortgage Co. v. De WaltoffAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  4. Barnard v. . OnderdonkNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  5. Whorton v. WebsterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Shultis v. Woodstock Land Development AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Shane v. WINTER HILL FEDERAL SAVINGS & LOAN ASS'NMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  3. Empire Trust Co. v. Park-Lexington Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  4. In Re EarlUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 1992
  5. Pisano v. RandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API