Legal Opinion

Dietzen v. American Trust & Banking Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1939PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice DeHaven

The question presented for determination is whether or not complainant acquired valid title to certain United States Savings Bonds, having an accrued value of $1,500, and certain United States Postal Savings Certificates, having a face value of $2,500, by virtue of a gift made to him by his mother, Mrs. Rosa Dietzen.

It is contended for defendant that the bonds and certificates were not endorsed and, in fact, are nontransferable and nonnegotiable and no title conld pass by delivery.

The chancellor granted complainant a decree for the total amount of the bonds and certificates. On defendant’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Basket v. HassellSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Scott v. Union & Planters' Bank & Trust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Chandler v. RoddyTennessee Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Marshall v. RussellTennessee Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Wilson v. WilsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Boling v. GibsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  2. Moore's Adm'r v. MarshallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1946
  3. Collins v. McCanlessTennessee Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Pospishil v. KempNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Connell v. BauerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API