Legal Opinion · Dissent

Union Pacific Railroad v. State Board of Equalization

California Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1989No. S001602Published

1DissentMosk, J.

I dissent. The majority render section 32 of article XIII of the California Constitution (hereafter section 32) a nullity by requiring that the board must establish that the strategic plan must in fact be relevant to the board’s consideration of Union Pacific’s tax return rather than that it might be relevant. This is a critical distinction because the entire thrust of section 32 is to ensure that the collection of taxes continues unabated while a taxpayer and the government litigate a dispute about the assessment and collection of taxes. (Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Bd. of…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Enochs v. Williams Packing & Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. People v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. United States v. Arthur Young & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. In Re LifschutzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API