Legal Opinion

State v. Littlefield

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 18, 1966PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARDEN, Justice.

On appeal. Respondent’s exceptions to the refusal of the presiding Justice to direct a verdict in his favor and an appeal from a denial by the presiding Justice of a motion for a new trial raise but one issue, State v. Bobb, 138 Me. 242, 25 A.2d 229, and State v. Lumbert et al., 152 Me. 131, 133, 124 A.2d 746, whether the evidence supports a jury finding of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

The appellant was charged with committing a crime against nature with a minor male. Upon defendant’s motion for a bill of particulars the State was ordered to file such a bill specifying,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. Frank Roosevelt HaskinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1965
  2. United States v. NeffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1954
  3. United States v. Edwin MurrayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
  4. United States v. Solon Glaze, Also Known as SoloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
  5. Commonwealth v. IannelloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. DavenportSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  2. State v. LizotteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1969
  3. State v. BennerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1971
  4. State v. LarrabeeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
  5. State v. BoireSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API