Legal Opinion

Sabasteanski v. Pagurko

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 11, 1967PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBBER, Justice.

This was a real action brought pursuant to M.R.C.P., Rule 80A. It comes here on report on an agreed statement of facts.

Both parties claim ownership of a parcel of land in South Harpswell containing three acres. On September 20, 1960 this and other property was owned by the estates of Lena Calkins and Irving Calkins. On that date the executors of these estates joined by one Neill gave to Russell and Ma rian Given a deed of certain property including by specific description the three acre parcel here in dispute. The deed was ■not under seal. This deed was recorded on December…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Coffin v. RichSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1858
  2. Emerson v. ShoresSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1901
  3. Bowman v. GeyerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1928
  4. Inhabitants of Otisfield v. ScribnerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1930
  5. Jones v. Webster Woolen Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1892

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Fournier v. FournierSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
  2. Burke v. Hamilton Beach Division, Scovill Manufacturing Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  3. Tompkins v. Wade & Searway Construction Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  4. Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
  5. Matteson v. BatchelderSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API