State v. Baxley
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Concurring in part, dissenting in part 1
Opinion by
2Concurring in part, dissenting in part · AcobaAcoba, J.
I disagree that this court lacks jurisdiction to review this case on the following grounds: (1) Jurisdiction exists to decide the claims of Defendant-Appellant James Gavin Baxley (Defendant) under Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 602-5(7) (1993) for the promotion of justice; (2) Plaintiff-Appellee State of Ha-wai'i (the prosecution) must prove each element of a charged crime beyond a reasonable doubt even if the defendant is acquitted by reason of insanity; (3) in the absence of such proof the presumption of innocence applies and, thus, acquittal in this case does not moot an appeal…
3Cases cited45 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.