Legal Opinion

State v. Baxley

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 2003No. 22805Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part 1

Opinion by

2Concurring in part, dissenting in part · AcobaAcoba, J.

I disagree that this court lacks jurisdiction to review this case on the following grounds: (1) Jurisdiction exists to decide the claims of Defendant-Appellant James Gavin Baxley (Defendant) under Hawai'i Revised Statutes (HRS) § 602-5(7) (1993) for the promotion of justice; (2) Plaintiff-Appellee State of Ha-wai'i (the prosecution) must prove each element of a charged crime beyond a reasonable doubt even if the defendant is acquitted by reason of insanity; (3) in the absence of such proof the presumption of innocence applies and, thus, acquittal in this case does not moot an appeal…

3Cases cited45 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Patterson v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Estelle v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API