McLees v. Felt

This was an action of replevin by the appellants against the appellee for a quantity of merchandize.

The defendant answered in avoidance, setting up, in substance, that he was entitled to a lien on the goods, for the freight on the transportation thereof from Cincinnati Ohio, to Peru, Indiana, and from Peru to Wabash; fore the plaintiffs were not entitled to the possession of the goods.

Replication in denial.

Trial by jury; verdict for defendant; and jud, the verdict, a motion for a new trial being overruled!

On the trial, the Court gave the defendant the op and close of the case. Exception was…