Legal Opinion

E.C.M. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 7, 2003No. 2D01-1220PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIS, Judge.

E.C.M. challenges the circuit court’s order requiring him to pay $1829 in restitution. We reverse because the trial court imposed restitution without offering E.C.M. counsel or determining that he voluntarily waived his right to counsel.

Section 985.203(1), Florida Statutes (2000), provides:

A child is entitled to representation by legal counsel at all stages of any proceedings under this part.... A child shall be represented by legal counsel at all stages of all court proceedings unless the right to counsel is freely, knowingly, and intelligently waived by the child. If the child…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brewer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. J.G.S. v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. Hodas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Amendments to the Florida Rules of Juvenile ProcedureSupreme Court of Florida · 2005
  2. ECM v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API