Legal Opinion

Cutts v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 31, 2008No. 2D06-192Published

1Opinion of the Court

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF FLORIDA

2Per curiam

In Cutts v. State, 940 So.2d 1246 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006), this court affirmed Gregory A. Cutts’ sentences imposed in 2005 and certified conflict with the First District’s decision in Isaac v. State, 911 So.2d 813 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005). The supreme court granted review, quashed this court’s decision, and remanded the case with directions to perform a harmless error analysis based upon the decision in Galindez v. State, 955 So.2d 517 (Fla.2007). See Cutts v. State, 976 So.2d 579 (Fla.2008). We now affirm because any errors made during Mr. Cutts’ 2005…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Galindez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
  2. Isaac v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
  3. Cutts v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  4. Cutts v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API