Legal Opinion

Fahey v. Boulmay

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 26, 1900PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error from Fort Bend. Tried below "before Hon. Wells Thompson.

1Opinion of the Court

GABBETT, Chief Justice.

This action was brought in the District Court by the defendants in error against the sureties upon the bond of P. S. Wren as guardian of the minors Matthew S., Catharine B., and Mary S. Boulmay, children of Isaac Boulmay, deceased, to recover money shown to be due by the judgment of the probate court. Wren qualified as guardian- of the minors and executed a bond as guardian, approved January 17, 1883, payable to the county judge of the county of Galveston, conditioned “that whereas the above bound P. S. Wren has been appointed by the county judge of Galveston, guardian…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Southern Surety Co. v. BurneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Texas Creosoting Co. v. Hartburg Lumber Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1929
  3. Hunt v. EvansCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. ParkerWyoming Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Arden v. BooneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API