Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Chambers

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 25, 1985No. D001539PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WIENER, Acting P. J.

In Henn v. Henn (1980) 26 Cal.3d 323 [161 Cal.Rptr. 502, 605 P.2d 10] the California Supreme Court held the doc trines of res judicata and collateral estoppel did not bar a spouse from recovering his or her community interest in the vested and matured military pension benefits omitted from the petition and later judgment of dissolution of marriage. The Henn court qualified full retroactive enforcement of such rights, however, by allowing the military retiree to raise the defenses of equitable estoppel and laches. (Id. at pp. 332-333.) In such cases the trial court…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. In Re Marriage of FithianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Henn v. HennCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. In Re Marriage of SheldonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. In Re Marriage of HopkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of CastleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  2. In Re Marriage of StephensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. In Re Marriage of StierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. In Re Marriage of CastleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API