Legal Opinion

United States v. National City Bank of New York

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 15, 1940PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEIBELL, District Judge.

The plaintiff, United States of America, has moved for summary judgment against the original defendant and third party plaintiff, the National City Bank of New York, which also moves for summary judgment against the third party defendant, Rose Gossert, Inc. Rule 56(a) and (b) F.R.C.P., 28 U.S.C.A. following section 723c.

The action was brought by United States of America against the National City Bank of New York to recover the sum of $1,030.-32 on deposit with that bank to the credit of the third party defendant, Rose Gossert, Inc. The complaint sets forth that on June…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ventura Consolidated Oil Fields v. RoganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Blommer Chocolate Co. v. Bongards Creameries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986
  2. United States v. Marine Midland Trust Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1942
  3. United States v. O'DellDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API