Legal Opinion
Donovan v. Robbins
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided October 5, 1983No. Nos. 78 C 4075, 82 C 7951PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WILL, District Judge.
These cases are before us on the motion of the Secretary of Labor (the Secretary), *595pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(f), to strike certain defenses in the Amended Answer filed in Donovan v. Robbins, 78 C 4075 (“78 C 4075”), by several defendants, hereinafter to be referred to collectively as “Amalgamated” or “the Amalgamated defendants”1 and to strike certain affirmative defenses in the Answer filed by those defendants in Donovan v. Dorfman, 82 C 7951 (“82 C 7951”). For the reasons which follow, that motion is granted in part and denied in part.
The Secretary…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission, Cross-Appellee v. Nelson Bunker Hunt, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Ruby Company, a Utah CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Pretty Products, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1991
- Raleigh v. Mid American National Bank & Trust Co. (In Re Stoecker)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1991
- Tarutis v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Reich v. Davidson Lumber Sales Emp. Ret. PlanDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1993
- Federal National Mortgage Ass'n v. CobbDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.