Legal Opinion

Supreme Builders, Inc. v. Redmiles

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 2, 1968No. [No. 283, September Term, 1967.]PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcWilliams, J.

Five surveyors testified in this boundary line dispute. We have read their testimony and we have examined their surveys but we must confess, reluctantly to be sure, to an inability to understand fully why they are in such disagreement. The appellant’s statement of the facts sheds little light on the matter and the appellees have finessed the requirement of Maryland Rule 831 d 3 1 by simply repeating what appears in the opinion of the trial judge, Mayfield, J. Since it is unlikely we could improve upon Judge Mayfield’s recital of the facts and since appellant’s version neither adds thereto nor…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sagner v. Glenangus Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  2. Abrams v. EckenrodeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1920
  3. Tamburo v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
  4. Hungerford v. HungerfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  5. Chesapeake Brewing Co. v. GoldbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. City of Bowie v. MIE, Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  2. Arbesman v. WinerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  3. Costello v. StaubitzCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  4. Ocean Plaza Joint Venture v. Crouse Construction Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  5. Miklasz v. G.W. Stone, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API