State v. Johnson
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
WASSERSTROM, Chief Judge.
Upon a jury trial in August 1978, defendant was found guilty of sodomy and rape. He appeals on the grounds that: (1) The jury selection was unconstitutionally discriminatory within the ruling of Duren v. Missouri, 439 U.S. 357, 99 S.Ct. 664, 58 L.Ed.2d 579 (1979); (2) the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction; and (3) the prosecutor made an improper argument to the jury.
Defendant’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence will be considered first, because if that point be valid then the conviction should be reversed outright and defendant discharged.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. HawkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- State v. MazzeriMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- State v. BeaversMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- State v. RogersMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. KoonceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Moses Moore v. Donald WyrickCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985
- State v. EllisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- State v. HarveyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- State v. ChaneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.