Legal Opinion
Headley v. Baron
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided May 28, 1968No. 67-932PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Per curiam
This appeal involves the extent of immunity granted pursuant to § 932.29, Fla. Stat., F.S.A., when a City employee is subpoenaed to testify before a grand jury.
The trial court, in a mandamus proceeding, directed the appellant to revoke an order of dismissal of the appellee.! In effect, it found that the provisions of the statute carried protection into the civil service proceedings of the City of Miami. In his final judgment, he said the following:
íjí % ‡ >¡í
“THIS CAUSE came on before me to be heard after filing by the Petitioner of his Petition for Writ of Mandamus, and after the issuance of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- City of Miami v. SteckloffSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
- Florida State Board of Architecture v. SeymourSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
- State Ex Rel. Dresskell v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1943
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Headley v. BaronSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
- Reese v. BaronDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971