Legal Opinion
Wilson v. Horsley
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided August 28, 1997No. 19560-7-IIPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHunt, J.
After mandatory arbitration and setting a trial de novo, Gary Horsley sought leave to amend his answer to a complaint for damages arising from an assault. On appeal Horsley argues that the trial court erred *565in denying his motions for leave to amend and for a jury trial. We affirm.
FACTS
On September 17, 1992, Gary Horsley assaulted Diana Wilson, causing permanent injury to her hand. On August 16, 1993, in Cowlitz County Superior Court, Wilson filed a complaint against Horsley for civil assault. Horsley filed his handwritten answer pro se; it stated:
I am not really sure what she is talking…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Smith v. ShannonWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Herron v. Tribune Publishing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1987
- Caruso v. Local Union No. 690Washington Supreme Court · 1983
- Christie-Lambert Van & Storage Co. v. McLeodCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- Westberg v. All-Purpose Structures, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wilson v. HorsleyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Wilson v. HorsleyWashington Supreme Court · 1999