Legal Opinion

Starr Piano Co. Sales Corporation v. Woodson

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided April 17, 1934No. 6 Div. 591Published

1Opinion of the Court

RICE, Judge.

This was a suit in detinue by appellant to recover a piano from appellee. Verdict and judgment went for appellee.

Appellant had given bond and was in possession of the piano in suit.

Upon the trial, before a jury, the verdict was, simply; “We the jury find for the defendant,” with judgment accordingly.

The value of the piano and damages should have been assessed (Code 1923, § 7392); but appellant cannot be heard to complain of the omission. It was not harmed. Kirkland v. Eford, 205 Ala. 72, 87 So. 364; and especially, International Harvester Co. of America v. Pittman et al., 226 Ala.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kirkland v. EfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. International Harvester Co. of America v. PittmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API