Legal Opinion

Robert D. Pakcard v. Commissioner of IRS

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided March 27, 2014No. 13-10586PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant Commissioner of Internal Revenue (“the Commissioner”) appeals the Tax Court’s grant of summary judgment to Appellee Robert Packard (“Mr. Packard”) on his pro se petition for review of a tax deficiency determination. At issue in this case is whether the Tax Court erred as a matter of law in holding that Mr. Packard and his wife, Marianna (“Mrs. Packard”) (collectively “the Packards”), were entitled to the first-time homebuyer tax credit even though, when considered as a single marital unit, they did not qualify for the credit under 26 U.S.C. § 36(c) of the Internal Revenue Code. We…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Indopco, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Crooks v. HarrelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. BedRoc Limited, LLC v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Thomas W. Roberts v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Maryann Larkin v. Commissioner of IRSCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
  2. BBX Capital v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
  3. Bender v. Vertex Energy, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2024
  4. Bohner v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2014
  5. Bohner v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API