Tiznado v. Orlando Regional Healthcare System
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
The claimant appeals a workers’ compensation order by which her claim for medical care was denied. We conclude that the judge should not have applied the provider reimbursement manual to this dispute between the claimant and the employer, and that the care should have been awarded pursuant to section 440.13(2)(a), Florida Statutes, upon the judge’s determination of medical necessity.
The claimant sustained industrial injuries and underwent multiple surgeries, with an authorized doctor thereafter recommending pain management processes and therapy, while prescribing various medications and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Williams v. Triple J EnterprisesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
- Furtick v. William Shults ContractorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
3Cited by3 opinions
- Avalon Center v. HardawayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
- Millette v. MilletteAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
- Marine Max, Inc., and Seabright Insurance Company v. Charles BlairDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019