Legal Opinion

Tiznado v. Orlando Regional Healthcare System

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 28, 2000No. 1D99-2972PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The claimant appeals a workers’ compensation order by which her claim for medical care was denied. We conclude that the judge should not have applied the provider reimbursement manual to this dispute between the claimant and the employer, and that the care should have been awarded pursuant to section 440.13(2)(a), Florida Statutes, upon the judge’s determination of medical necessity.

The claimant sustained industrial injuries and underwent multiple surgeries, with an authorized doctor thereafter recommending pain management processes and therapy, while prescribing various medications and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Williams v. Triple J EnterprisesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. Furtick v. William Shults ContractorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Avalon Center v. HardawayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  2. Millette v. MilletteAlaska Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Marine Max, Inc., and Seabright Insurance Company v. Charles BlairDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API