Legal Opinion

State v. Janowski

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided February 8, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

BRAITHWAITE, J.A.D.

The State appeals, by leave granted, from an order suppressing the out-of-court photographic identification of defendant Michael Janowski because the set of computerized photographs from which defendant was identified by the victim was not preserved and recorded. The State contends that the motion judge erroneously interpreted existing law and that the automatic exclusion of the out-of-court identification is inappropriate. We agree with the State and now reverse.

Defendant was arrested and subsequently indicted for: (1) first-degree…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. State v. HurdSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  4. State v. ClausellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
  5. State v. MadisonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Philip Woodyard v. County of EssexCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  2. State v. JosephNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
  3. State v. Kwesi Green (080562) (Essex County and Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API