Legal Opinion

Collin & Gissel v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 20, 1945No. 6174; Entry No. 674-H, etcPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Cole, Judge:

The value of torsion' balances, field balances, and accessories and parts for each is the subject of these appeals for reappraisement.

Substantially the same merchandise has been the subject of previous reappraisement litigation, United States v. T. E. Ash (American Askania Corp.), Freedman & Slater, 23 C. C. P. A. 360, T. D. 48211, and United States v. T. E. Ash et al., 2 Cust. Ct. 1017, Reap. Dec. 4601. The records in the cited cases have been incorporated herein by consent of the parties.

In each of the incorporated cases, cost of production, section 402 (f) of the Tariff Act of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. RichardCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API