Legal Opinion

Platner v. Johnson & Wheeler

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1842Published

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Co wen, J.

This was not a joint action against different parties under the statute, but against several makers of the note whom the plaintiff has chosen to sue jointly. In such case there is no right to sever the action and take judgment against one of the defendants. (Bank of Genesee v. Field, 19 Wend. 643, 4.) If there were such right, it is by no means clear that an affidavit by one of them would not be sufficient for the mere purpose of upholding the plea. It is very rare in such case that a defence complete for one defendant is not equally so for the other. In this case,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bank of Genessee v. FieldNew York Supreme Court · 1839
  2. Wirts v. NortonNew York Supreme Court · 1841
  3. City of Buffalo v. ScrantonNew York Supreme Court · 1839

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API