Kassube v. Dakota Logging
South Dakota Supreme Court
1DissentSrstka, Circuit Judge
[¶ 63.] I must dissent to the majority’s decision on Issue Three and Four. The issue here is which of two statutes applies. The majority uses the last injurious exposure rule found in SDCL 62-1-18 and Department applied the apportionment statute found in SDCL 62-4-29. I think that the rationale for using the apportionment statute is well founded in fact and law and should determine these issues.
[¶ 64.] SDCL 62-4-29 states:
As to an employee who before the accident for which he claims compensation was disabled and drawing compensation under the terms of this title, the compensation for each…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mycogen Seeds v. SandsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
- Johnson v. Albertson'sSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Abild v. Gateway 2000, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Lends His Horse v. Myrl & Roy's Paving, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Mettler v. Sibco, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2001