Legal Opinion

Romesburg v. Federal Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 5, 1938No. 33,678PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Thiele, J.:

This was an action to recover benefits claimed to be due under a policy of health insurance, and from a judgment for plaintiff the defendant appeals.

For convenience we shall refer to the appellant as the company, and to the appellee as the insured. In December, 1921, the company issued to the insured what was called a special commercial disability policy, provisions of which are quoted below. In September, 1922, the insured suffered an illness, and upon presentation of his claim the company commenced to pay him weekly payments of fifteen…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. Missouri State Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1932
  2. Sheets v. Farmers & Merchants Mutual Life & Casualty Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  3. Wenstrom v. Ætna Life InsuranceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Richardson v. Interstate Business Men's Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  5. Heymann v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1920

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Ins. Co. Of New York v. WeigelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
  2. Mutual Life Ins. Co. Of New York v. WeigelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API