Legal Opinion

Brodsky v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided June 2, 2016No. 15-1330-cvPublished

1Opinion of the Court

*806SUMMARY ORDER

Plaintiff Richard L. Brodsky brought this action to challenge a decision by defendant United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (“NRC”) exempting Indian Point 3, a nuclear power plant operated by intervenor Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., from a federal fire-safety regulation. See 10 C.F.R. pt. 50, App. R. § III.G.2.C. On Brodsky’s initial appeal from a grant of summary judgment to the NRC, this panel affirmed in all respects but one, see generally Brodsky v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm’n, 507 Fed. Appx. 48 (2d Cir. 2013), remanding the case for further record development on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Department of Transportation v. Public CitizenSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. De Johnson v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  3. Natural Resources Defense Council v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  4. Brodsky v. United States Nuclear Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
  5. New York v. United States Nuclear Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API