Legal Opinion

Sharif v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 6, 2005No. A05A0379PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Presiding Judge.

A jury found Maruf Sharif guilty of aggravated assault. Sharif appeals, alleging the trial court erred in (1) allowing hearsay statements of a nontestifying witness into evidence, (2) allowing the state to put his character in issue, and (3) allowing the state to ask leading questions during direct examination. Sharif also claims the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction, and he was provided ineffective assistance of counsel. We find no error and affirm Sharifs conviction.

Viewed in a light most favorable to support the jury’s verdict, the evidence shows…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Fults v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  3. Glass v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  4. Kilpatrick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  5. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Metoyer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  2. Philpot v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  3. Harper v. the StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  4. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  5. Wilson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API