Legal Opinion

Calamusa v. Board of Review

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 11, 1978PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

164 N.J. Super. 325 (1978)

396 A.2d 351

NICHOLAS CALAMUSA, APPELLANT,

v.

BOARD OF REVIEW ET AL., RESPONDENT.

MURIEL HOLSTEIN, APPELLANT,

v.

BOARD OF REVIEW ET AL., RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Submitted November 27, 1978.

Decided December 11, 1978.

Before Judges CONFORD and PRESSLER.

Mr. Stuart Kahn, attorney for appellants.

Mr. John J. Degnan, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney for respondent (Mr. Michael S. Bokar, Deputy Attorney General, of counsel; Mr. Ivan J. Punchatz, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).

2Per curiam

These appeals were consolidated for submission to the…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Worsnop v. Bd. of Review, Div. of Emp. SEC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
  2. Ferry v. BD. OF REVIEW, DIV. EMP. SEC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974

4Cited by5 opinions

  1. Patrick v. Board of ReviewNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
  2. Fort Wayne Community Schools v. Review Board of Indiana Employment Security DivisionIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Sulat v. Board of ReviewNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
  4. Chicago Teachers Union, Etc. v. Donald Johnson, Individually and as Director of Labor, State of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1980
  5. Grand Rapids Public Schools v. FalkensternMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API